yes24.com
33/100
Ranked #43,914 of 46,880 sites
yes24.com
33/100 · #43,914 of 46,880
homepagerankings.com
B2C SaaS / Consumer App Benchmarks
How you compare to 3,549 B2C SaaS / Consumer App sites
Gray line = B2C SaaS / Consumer App median
Analysis
Yes24 scores 33 out of 100 on homepage messaging, earning a D- grade — mixed. Across all 30,134 sites analyzed, that's well below the median of 59. Within B2C SaaS / Consumer App, where the median is 64, Yes24 lands 31 points below the industry average.
No hero text found. Visitors see nothing above the fold that tells them what you do. With a clarity score of 25, Yes24 is below the overall median of 36.
The page has 11 CTAs, 2 of them above the fold. The primary CTA "������ ���� ���ͽ� ��ȭ���� (KPop Demon Hunters Fro…" is generic — 'Learn more' and 'Get started' don't tell visitors what happens next. CTA effectiveness score: 45 (below the median of 57).
Audience targeting is unclear. Detected audience: Audience not defined on the page. ICP clarity score: 0 (below the median of 35).
On the pricing page: Enter your pricing page URL directly (try https://yes24.com/pricing) for a full analysis.
The biggest opportunities for Yes24: Audience targeting is weak — adding a "for [specific role/company type]" pattern would sharpen the positioning immediately. First impression clarity is below median — visitors can't quickly tell what category this product falls into. CTA effectiveness is below median — consider using action-oriented language ("Start free trial") over generic buttons ("Learn more").
Fix These First
up to +73 ptsRanked by estimated impact on your overall score
Add a clear hero headline
No hero headline detected — the most important real estate on your page is empty
Add a "for [specific audience]" pattern to your hero
Visitors can't tell if this product is for them — specificity wins trust
Close first-impression gaps
Visitors can't quickly tell who it's for and what it does — those signals should be above the fold
Make your CTA more specific
"Get started" is generic — tie it to an outcome ("Start building" or "See your report")
Add a CTA to your pricing page
Pricing page has no clear call-to-action — visitors can't convert
First Impression
F (12/100)“A visitor would think this is a b2b saas for someone that offers something unclear.”
B2B SaaS
Unknown
Unknown
None detected
Neutral
Gaps:
- -Business category is implied but not clearly stated.
- -No clear target audience defined. Could be for anyone, which means it resonates with no one.
- -Product function unclear from above-fold copy. Visitors cannot tell what this does.
- -No discernible value proposition. The page does not explain why someone should care.
Suggested Rewrites
Better copy based on your product signals — click to copy
Current
������ ���� ���ͽ� ��ȭ���� (KPop Demon Hunters From The Netflix Series OST)
Tying your CTA to a specific outcome increases click-through
Current
����, Ƽ��, ����, ����, Ŀ�´�Ƽ���� ��ȭ ������ �ƿ츣�� ���� ��ǥ ��ȭ������ �÷���, �Ƴ����� ���ð� �Ѿ˹���� �����غ�����.
This is what shows in Google results — specificity drives higher click-through rates
A/B Test Ideas
Specific experiments to run, ranked by expected impact
Test adding "free" or "no card required" to your primary CTA
Risk-reducing modifiers typically lift click-through 10-15%
Test a "free" modifier on your CTA: "������ ���� ���ͽ� ��ȭ���…" vs "������ ���� ���ͽ� ��ȭ���… — Free"
"Free" is the highest-converting modifier across 27K+ homepages analyzed
Test adding "for Audience not defined on the page" to your hero or subheadline
Naming your audience explicitly increases relevance. Visitors self-qualify faster when they see themselves.
Test adding social proof above the fold (customer count, logos, or testimonial)
No social proof detected. Even one trust signal ("Join 500+ teams") can lift conversions significantly.
Test adding an annual/monthly billing toggle with a discount
Annual billing toggles with visible savings ("Save 20%") are a standard conversion lever.
Messaging Clarity
CTA Analysis
C- (45/100)Total CTAs
11
Above Fold
2
Best CTA
Tier 3
What Do You Sell?
F (25/100)Hero
absentMeta Description
generic����, Ƽ��, ����, ����, Ŀ�´�Ƽ���� ��ȭ ������ �ƿ츣�� ���� ��ǥ ��ȭ������ �÷���, �Ƴ����� ���ð� �Ѿ˹���� �����غ�����.
ICP Clarity
F (0/100)Detected audience
absentAudience not defined on the page
Pricing Page
F (15/100)How You Compare
vs. other B2C SaaS / Consumer App sites in the index
| Dimension | yes24.com | traveljoy.com | sendcloud.com | brainstormfor… | newzenler.com |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 33 | 89-56 | 88-55 | 87-54 | 87-54 |
| Clarity | 25 | 59-34 | 72-47 | 87-62 | 72-47 |
| CTA | 45 | 85-40 | 85-40 | 60-15 | 90-45 |
| ICP | 0 | 58-58 | 90-90 | 84-84 | 90-90 |
| 1st Impr. | 12 | 78-66 | 52-40 | 40-28 | 40-28 |
| Pricing | 15 | 80-65 | 80-65 | 0+15 | 100-85 |
What We Analyzed
Title
����24
Word count
3,939
More in B2C SaaS / Consumer App
View B2C SaaS / Consumer App benchmarks →Track Your Progress
Last scanned 49 days ago. Time to check if your homepage has improved.
yes24.com scored 33/100.
We fix exactly this. Messaging, CTAs, positioning. Ready-to-ship, not a slide deck.
Work with us