whatwg.org
63/100
Ranked #17,001 of 46,880 sites
whatwg.org
63/100 · #17,001 of 46,880
homepagerankings.com
Media / Content / Publishing Benchmarks
How you compare to 6,908 Media / Content / Publishing sites
Gray line = Media / Content / Publishing median
Analysis
Whatwg scores 63 out of 100 on homepage messaging, earning a B- grade — mixed. Across all 30,134 sites analyzed, that's close to the median of 59.
The hero text reads: "Welcome to the WHATWG community". Lacks action verbs. The hero does not describe what the product actually does, just makes a vague claim. The language is generic — a visitor can't tell what the product does from the headline alone.
The page has 1 CTA, 1 of them above the fold. That's a focused set, which avoids overwhelming visitors. The primary CTA "Participate Get started with contributing to the …" is a value-oriented CTA — it promises a benefit, not just an action. CTA effectiveness score: 80 (above the median of 57).
Audience targeting is unclear. Detected audience: Audience not defined on the page. ICP clarity score: 0 (below the median of 35).
Whatwg fits the "Community / Movement" archetype with high confidence. This means the homepage is rallying users around a mission or identity, not just a product.
On the pricing page: Whatwg has an FAQ section. Show actual prices on your pricing page. Hidden pricing creates friction and drives visitors away.
The biggest opportunities for Whatwg: Audience targeting is weak — adding a "for [specific role/company type]" pattern would sharpen the positioning immediately. First impression clarity is below median — visitors can't quickly tell what category this product falls into. Clarity is 6 points below median — the hero text needs to say what the product does in plain language.
Fix These First
up to +44 ptsRanked by estimated impact on your overall score
Add a "for [specific audience]" pattern to your hero
Visitors can't tell if this product is for them — specificity wins trust
Rewrite your hero headline
Generic language — visitors can't tell what you do from the headline alone
Close first-impression gaps
Visitors can't quickly tell what category you're in and who it's for — those signals should be above the fold
Add a free tier or annual billing option
Low-commitment entry points (free tier, annual discount) reduce purchase friction
First Impression
F (20/100)“A visitor would think this is a some kind of company for someone that offers app.”
Unknown
Unknown
app
Status / Identity / Belonging
Neutral
Gaps:
- -No clear business category. Visitors cannot tell what kind of company this is.
- -No clear target audience defined. Could be for anyone, which means it resonates with no one.
- -Product description is vague. Visitors get a rough idea but no clear picture.
- -Value proposition is weakly communicated. Benefits are implied, not stated.
Suggested Rewrites
Better copy based on your product signals — click to copy
Current
Welcome to the WHATWG community
Your current headline is generic — these alternatives name what you do for whom
A/B Test Ideas
Specific experiments to run, ranked by expected impact
Test a hero headline that names your product category explicitly
Generic headlines force visitors to scroll to understand what you sell. Test naming the category in the first 5 words.
Test adding "for Audience not defined on the page" to your hero or subheadline
Naming your audience explicitly increases relevance. Visitors self-qualify faster when they see themselves.
Test adding an annual/monthly billing toggle with a discount
Annual billing toggles with visible savings ("Save 20%") are a standard conversion lever.
Messaging Clarity
CTA Analysis
B+ (80/100)Total CTAs
1
Above Fold
1
Best CTA
Tier 2
What Do You Sell?
D- (30/100)Hero
genericWelcome to the WHATWG community
Meta Description
absentICP Clarity
F (0/100)Detected audience
absentAudience not defined on the page
Positioning Archetype
95% confidenceCommunity / Movement
Welcome to the WHATWG community
Confidence: 95%
Pricing Page
C+ (68/100)1 pricing tier detected
How You Compare
vs. other Media / Content / Publishing sites in the index
| Dimension | whatwg.org | keap.com | zight.com | infusionsoft.… | managewp.com |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 63 | 87-24 | 87-24 | 87-24 | 86-23 |
| Clarity | 30 | 59-29 | 100-70 | 59-29 | 100-70 |
| CTA | 80 | 75+5 | 60+20 | 75+5 | 75+5 |
| ICP | 0 | 46-46 | 91-91 | 46-46 | 15-15 |
| 1st Impr. | 20 | 60-40 | 60-40 | 60-40 | 52-32 |
| Pricing | 68 | 95-27 | 80-12 | 95-27 | 100-32 |
What We Analyzed
Title
Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group (WHATWG)
Word count
99
Hero text
Welcome to the WHATWG community
More in Media / Content / Publishing
View Media / Content / Publishing benchmarks →Track Your Progress
Last scanned 63 days ago. Time to check if your homepage has improved.
whatwg.org scored 63/100.
We fix exactly this. Messaging, CTAs, positioning. Ready-to-ship, not a slide deck.
Work with us