wattsupwiththat.com
59/100
Ranked #23,981 of 46,880 sites
wattsupwiththat.com
59/100 · #23,981 of 46,880
homepagerankings.com
Media / Content / Publishing Benchmarks
How you compare to 6,908 Media / Content / Publishing sites
Gray line = Media / Content / Publishing median
Analysis
Wattsupwiththat scores 59 out of 100 on homepage messaging, earning a C grade — average — basic messaging is present but generic. Across all 30,134 sites analyzed, that's close to the median of 59.
The hero text reads: "Watts Up With That?". Lacks action verbs. The hero does not describe what the product actually does, just makes a vague claim. The language is generic — a visitor can't tell what the product does from the headline alone.
The page has 5 CTAs, 4 of them above the fold. That's enough to trigger decision paralysis — when too many buttons compete for attention, visitors often click none. The primary CTA "New? Start Here" is a value-oriented CTA — it promises a benefit, not just an action.
Audience targeting is unclear. Detected audience: Audience not defined on the page. ICP clarity score: 0 (below the median of 35).
Wattsupwiththat fits the "Community / Movement" archetype with moderate confidence. This means the homepage is rallying users around a mission or identity, not just a product.
On the pricing page: Wattsupwiththat has a free tier, social proof elements, and an FAQ section. 2 pricing tiers is a solid structure. Show actual prices on your pricing page. Hidden pricing creates friction and drives visitors away.
The biggest opportunities for Wattsupwiththat: Audience targeting is weak — adding a "for [specific role/company type]" pattern would sharpen the positioning immediately. First impression clarity is below median — visitors can't quickly tell what category this product falls into.
Fix These First
up to +62 ptsRanked by estimated impact on your overall score
Add a "for [specific audience]" pattern to your hero
Visitors can't tell if this product is for them — specificity wins trust
Close first-impression gaps
Visitors can't quickly tell who it's for and what it does — those signals should be above the fold
Rewrite your hero headline
Generic language — visitors can't tell what you do from the headline alone
Reduce CTAs above the fold to one primary action
4 competing buttons cause decision paralysis — visitors click none
Add a CTA to your pricing page
Pricing page has no clear call-to-action — visitors can't convert
First Impression
F (12/100)“A visitor would think this is a b2b saas for someone that offers something unclear.”
B2B SaaS
Unknown
Unknown
None detected
Neutral
Gaps:
- -Business category is implied but not clearly stated.
- -No clear target audience defined. Could be for anyone, which means it resonates with no one.
- -Product function unclear from above-fold copy. Visitors cannot tell what this does.
- -No discernible value proposition. The page does not explain why someone should care.
Suggested Rewrites
Better copy based on your product signals — click to copy
Current
Watts Up With That?
Your current headline is generic — these alternatives name what you do for whom
A/B Test Ideas
Specific experiments to run, ranked by expected impact
Remove all secondary CTAs above the fold — keep only one primary action
4 competing CTAs detected. Single-CTA pages typically convert 20-30% better.
Test a hero headline that names your product category explicitly
Generic headlines force visitors to scroll to understand what you sell. Test naming the category in the first 5 words.
Test adding "for Audience not defined on the page" to your hero or subheadline
Naming your audience explicitly increases relevance. Visitors self-qualify faster when they see themselves.
Rewrite above-fold copy from "we" language to "you" language
Your copy says "we" 4x and "you" 0x. Visitor-centric copy typically converts better.
Test adding an annual/monthly billing toggle with a discount
Annual billing toggles with visible savings ("Save 20%") are a standard conversion lever.
Messaging Clarity
CTA Analysis
C+ (60/100)Total CTAs
5
Above Fold
4
Best CTA
Tier 2
What Do You Sell?
D- (32/100)In 5 words:
Search search
Hero
genericWatts Up With That?
Meta Description
absentICP Clarity
F (0/100)Detected audience
absentAudience not defined on the page
Positioning Archetype
70% confidenceCommunity / Movement
Watts Up With That?
Confidence: 70%
Pricing Page
B (70/100)2 pricing tiers detected
How You Compare
vs. other Media / Content / Publishing sites in the index
| Dimension | wattsupwiththat.c… | keap.com | zight.com | infusionsoft.… | managewp.com |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 59 | 87-28 | 87-28 | 87-28 | 86-27 |
| Clarity | 32 | 59-27 | 100-68 | 59-27 | 100-68 |
| CTA | 60 | 75-15 | 60 | 75-15 | 75-15 |
| ICP | 0 | 46-46 | 91-91 | 46-46 | 15-15 |
| 1st Impr. | 12 | 60-48 | 60-48 | 60-48 | 52-40 |
| Pricing | 70 | 95-25 | 80-10 | 95-25 | 100-30 |
What We Analyzed
Title
Watts Up With That? - The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change
Word count
1,581
Hero text
Watts Up With That?
More in Media / Content / Publishing
View Media / Content / Publishing benchmarks →Track Your Progress
Last scanned 49 days ago. Time to check if your homepage has improved.
wattsupwiththat.com scored 59/100.
We fix exactly this. Messaging, CTAs, positioning. Ready-to-ship, not a slide deck.
Work with us