them.us
59/100
Ranked #23,912 of 46,880 sites
them.us
59/100 · #23,912 of 46,880
homepagerankings.com
Developer Tools / Infrastructure Benchmarks
How you compare to 6,886 Developer Tools / Infrastructure sites
Gray line = Developer Tools / Infrastructure median
Analysis
Them.us scores 59 out of 100 on homepage messaging, earning a C grade — average — basic messaging is present but generic. Across all 30,134 sites analyzed, that's close to the median of 59.
The hero text reads: "Them.". Lacks action verbs. The hero does not describe what the product actually does, just makes a vague claim. The language is generic — a visitor can't tell what the product does from the headline alone. With a clarity score of 22, Them.us is below the overall median of 36.
The page has 16 CTAs, 2 of them above the fold. The primary CTA "Start Spreading the News: NYC May Have the Fastes…" is a value-oriented CTA — it promises a benefit, not just an action. CTA effectiveness score: 75 (above the median of 57).
Audience targeting is unclear. Detected audience: Media / Content / Publishing. ICP clarity score: 15 (below the median of 35).
Them.us fits the "Community / Movement" archetype with high confidence. This means the homepage is rallying users around a mission or identity, not just a product.
On the pricing page: Them.us has a free tier and an annual billing toggle. 4 pricing tiers is a solid structure. Add a FAQ section to your pricing page. It addresses objections and reduces support load.
The biggest opportunities for Them.us: Audience targeting is weak — adding a "for [specific role/company type]" pattern would sharpen the positioning immediately. First impression clarity is below median — visitors can't quickly tell what category this product falls into. Clarity is 14 points below median — the hero text needs to say what the product does in plain language.
Fix These First
up to +44 ptsRanked by estimated impact on your overall score
Rewrite your hero headline
Generic language — visitors can't tell what you do from the headline alone
Close first-impression gaps
Visitors can't quickly tell who it's for and what it does — those signals should be above the fold
Sharpen your audience targeting
"For businesses" or "for teams" is too broad — name a role, industry, or company type
Simplify your above-fold copy
Grade level 30 reads like an academic paper — aim for grade 8-10
First Impression
F (12/100)“A visitor would think this is a b2b saas for someone that offers something unclear.”
B2B SaaS
Unknown
Unknown
None detected
Neutral
Gaps:
- -Business category is implied but not clearly stated.
- -No clear target audience defined. Could be for anyone, which means it resonates with no one.
- -Product function unclear from above-fold copy. Visitors cannot tell what this does.
- -No discernible value proposition. The page does not explain why someone should care.
A/B Test Ideas
Specific experiments to run, ranked by expected impact
Test a hero headline that names your product category explicitly
Generic headlines force visitors to scroll to understand what you sell. Test naming the category in the first 5 words.
Test a "Built for [role/company type]" line under your hero
The "for X" pattern is the fastest way to sharpen positioning. Test it as a subheadline.
Test reducing pricing tiers from 4 to 3
Too many options cause choice paralysis. The ideal is 3 tiers with a highlighted recommended plan.
Test adding a one-line product description directly under your hero
Visitors can't tell what you do from the above-fold content. A single explanatory line can fix this.
Messaging Clarity
CTA Analysis
A- (75/100)Total CTAs
16
Above Fold
2
Best CTA
Tier 2
What Do You Sell?
F (22/100)Hero
genericThem.
Meta Description
absentICP Clarity
F (15/100)Detected audience
genericMedia / Content / Publishing
Positioning Archetype
100% confidenceCommunity / Movement
Them.
Confidence: 100%
Pricing Page
A+ (100/100)4 pricing tiers detected
How You Compare
vs. other Developer Tools / Infrastructure sites in the index
| Dimension | them.us | chatwoot.com | tapfiliate.com | delve.co | helpscout.com |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 59 | 89-30 | 88-29 | 87-28 | 87-28 |
| Clarity | 22 | 62-40 | 100-78 | 72-50 | 100-78 |
| CTA | 75 | 73 | 70+5 | 78 | 70+5 |
| ICP | 15 | 45-30 | 95-80 | 95-80 | 50-35 |
| 1st Impr. | 12 | 52-40 | 94-82 | 66-54 | 44-32 |
| Pricing | 100 | 95+5 | 100 | 95+5 | 100 |
What We Analyzed
Title
Homepage | Them
Word count
3,269
Hero text
Them.
More in Developer Tools / Infrastructure
View Developer Tools / Infrastructure benchmarks →Track Your Progress
Last scanned 49 days ago. Time to check if your homepage has improved.
them.us scored 59/100.
We fix exactly this. Messaging, CTAs, positioning. Ready-to-ship, not a slide deck.
Work with us