theintercept.com
59/100
Ranked #23,911 of 46,880 sites
theintercept.com
59/100 · #23,911 of 46,880
homepagerankings.com
Developer Tools / Infrastructure Benchmarks
How you compare to 6,886 Developer Tools / Infrastructure sites
Gray line = Developer Tools / Infrastructure median
Analysis
Theintercept scores 59 out of 100 on homepage messaging, earning a C grade — average — basic messaging is present but generic. Across all 30,134 sites analyzed, that's close to the median of 59.
The hero text reads: "State Department Tells Human Rights Watchdog to Ignore Trump’s Extrajudicial Killings". Lacks action verbs. The hero does not describe what the product actually does, just makes a vague claim. The language is generic — a visitor can't tell what the product does from the headline alone. With a clarity score of 22, Theintercept is below the overall median of 36.
The page has 5 CTAs, 3 of them above the fold. That's enough to trigger decision paralysis — when too many buttons compete for attention, visitors often click none. The primary CTA "Contact Us" is generic — 'Learn more' and 'Get started' don't tell visitors what happens next. CTA effectiveness score: 42 (below the median of 57).
Audience targeting is unclear. Detected audience: Media / Content / Publishing. ICP clarity score: 15 (below the median of 35).
Theintercept fits the "Community / Movement" archetype with high confidence. This means the homepage is rallying users around a mission or identity, not just a product.
The biggest opportunities for Theintercept: Audience targeting is weak — adding a "for [specific role/company type]" pattern would sharpen the positioning immediately. First impression clarity is below median — visitors can't quickly tell what category this product falls into. CTAs are causing decision paralysis — reduce to one primary action above the fold.
Fix These First
up to +70 ptsRanked by estimated impact on your overall score
Rewrite your hero headline
Generic language — visitors can't tell what you do from the headline alone
Reduce CTAs above the fold to one primary action
3 competing buttons cause decision paralysis — visitors click none
Close first-impression gaps
Visitors can't quickly tell who it's for and what it does — those signals should be above the fold
Add a pricing page
Hiding pricing creates friction — most buyers want to self-qualify before talking to sales
Make your CTA more specific
"Get started" is generic — tie it to an outcome ("Start building" or "See your report")
First Impression
F (12/100)“A visitor would think this is a b2b saas for someone that offers something unclear.”
B2B SaaS
Unknown
Unknown
None detected
Playful
Gaps:
- -Business category is implied but not clearly stated.
- -No clear target audience defined. Could be for anyone, which means it resonates with no one.
- -Product function unclear from above-fold copy. Visitors cannot tell what this does.
- -No discernible value proposition. The page does not explain why someone should care.
Suggested Rewrites
Better copy based on your product signals — click to copy
Current
Contact Us
Tying your CTA to a specific outcome increases click-through
A/B Test Ideas
Specific experiments to run, ranked by expected impact
Remove all secondary CTAs above the fold — keep only one primary action
3 competing CTAs detected. Single-CTA pages typically convert 20-30% better.
Test adding "free" or "no card required" to your primary CTA
Risk-reducing modifiers typically lift click-through 10-15%
Test a "free" modifier on your CTA: "Contact Us" vs "Contact Us — Free"
"Free" is the highest-converting modifier across 27K+ homepages analyzed
Test a hero headline that names your product category explicitly
Generic headlines force visitors to scroll to understand what you sell. Test naming the category in the first 5 words.
Test a "Built for [role/company type]" line under your hero
The "for X" pattern is the fastest way to sharpen positioning. Test it as a subheadline.
Messaging Clarity
CTA Analysis
D+ (42/100)Total CTAs
5
Above Fold
3
Best CTA
Tier 3
What Do You Sell?
F (22/100)Hero
genericState Department Tells Human Rights Watchdog to Ignore Trump’s Extrajudicial Killings
Meta Description
absentICP Clarity
F (15/100)Detected audience
genericMedia / Content / Publishing
Positioning Archetype
100% confidenceCommunity / Movement
State Department Tells Human Rights Watchdog to Ignore Trump’s Extrajudicial ...
Confidence: 100%
Pricing Page
F (0/100)No pricing page detected.
How You Compare
vs. other Developer Tools / Infrastructure sites in the index
| Dimension | theintercept.com | chatwoot.com | tapfiliate.com | delve.co | helpscout.com |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 59 | 89-30 | 88-29 | 87-28 | 87-28 |
| Clarity | 22 | 62-40 | 100-78 | 72-50 | 100-78 |
| CTA | 42 | 73-31 | 70-28 | 78-36 | 70-28 |
| ICP | 15 | 45-30 | 95-80 | 95-80 | 50-35 |
| 1st Impr. | 12 | 52-40 | 94-82 | 66-54 | 44-32 |
| Pricing | 0 | 95-95 | 100-100 | 95-95 | 100-100 |
What We Analyzed
Title
The Intercept
Word count
868
Hero text
State Department Tells Human Rights Watchdog to Ignore Trump’s Extrajudicial Killings
More in Developer Tools / Infrastructure
View Developer Tools / Infrastructure benchmarks →Track Your Progress
Last scanned 49 days ago. Time to check if your homepage has improved.
theintercept.com scored 59/100.
We fix exactly this. Messaging, CTAs, positioning. Ready-to-ship, not a slide deck.
Work with us