← All Tools

sup.org

C

61/100

Ranked #20,694 of 46,880 sites

Media / Content / PublishingSeed Stage
C

sup.org

61/100 · #20,694 of 46,880

homepagerankings.com

Media / Content / Publishing Benchmarks

How you compare to 6,908 Media / Content / Publishing sites

Overall
61
Product Clarity
15-28 vs median
CTA Effectiveness
45-12 vs median
ICP Targeting
45+7 vs median
First Impression
28

Gray line = Media / Content / Publishing median

Analysis

Sup scores 61 out of 100 on homepage messaging, earning a C grade — average — basic messaging is present but generic. Across all 30,134 sites analyzed, that's close to the median of 59.

No hero text found. Visitors see nothing above the fold that tells them what you do. With a clarity score of 15, Sup is below the overall median of 36.

The page has 12 CTAs, 4 of them above the fold. The primary CTA "Help with sup.org orders" is generic — 'Learn more' and 'Get started' don't tell visitors what happens next. CTA effectiveness score: 45 (below the median of 57).

Audience targeting is decent — there are audience signals, but room to be more specific. Detected audience: Nonprofit / NGO. The site uses a "for [X]" pattern: "policymakers and academics". ICP clarity score: 45 (above the median of 35).

Sup fits the "Community / Movement" archetype with high confidence. This means the homepage is rallying users around a mission or identity, not just a product.

The biggest opportunities for Sup: Clarity is 21 points below median — the hero text needs to say what the product does in plain language. CTA effectiveness is below median — consider using action-oriented language ("Start free trial") over generic buttons ("Learn more").

Fix These First

up to +51 pts

Ranked by estimated impact on your overall score

#1

Add a clear hero headline

No hero headline detected — the most important real estate on your page is empty

+22 ptsClarity
#2

Add a pricing page

Hiding pricing creates friction — most buyers want to self-qualify before talking to sales

+15 ptsPricing
#3

Make your CTA more specific

"Get started" is generic — tie it to an outcome ("Start building" or "See your report")

+10 ptsCTA
#4

Rewrite your meta description

Generic meta description — this is what shows up in Google results

+4 ptsClarity

First Impression

F (28/100)

A visitor would think this is a nonprofit / ngo for hr that offers something that publishs.

What kind of company?vague

Nonprofit / NGO

Who is it for?vague

HR

What does it do?vague

Something that publishs

What's the benefit?missing

None detected

What's the vibe?vague

Playful

Gaps:

  • -Business category is implied but not clearly stated.
  • -Target audience is hinted at but not explicitly called out.
  • -Product description is vague. Visitors get a rough idea but no clear picture.
  • -No discernible value proposition. The page does not explain why someone should care.

Suggested Rewrites

Better copy based on your product signals — click to copy

Primary CTA

Current

Help with sup.org orders

Tying your CTA to a specific outcome increases click-through

Meta Description

Current

Publisher of academic books in Anthropology, Asian Studies, Business, History, Jewish Studies, Latin American Studies, …

This is what shows in Google results — specificity drives higher click-through rates

A/B Test Ideas

Specific experiments to run, ranked by expected impact

Test adding "free" or "no card required" to your primary CTA

Risk-reducing modifiers typically lift click-through 10-15%

medium

Test a "free" modifier on your CTA: "Help with sup.org orders" vs "Help with sup.org orders — Free"

"Free" is the highest-converting modifier across 27K+ homepages analyzed

medium

Messaging Clarity

Who is this for?66/100
What problem does this solve?66/100
What does this actually do?58/100
Why this over alternatives?40/100
CTA effectiveness37/100

CTA Analysis

C- (45/100)

Total CTAs

12

Above Fold

4

Best CTA

Tier 3

Help with sup.org orders
T3 · 45/100
Media Requests
T3 · 45/100
Instagram iconSubscribe to our Instagram feed
T3 · 45/100
Join the conversation on Bluesky
T3 · 45/100
Learn More
above foldT4 · 37/100
Learn more about the press
T4 · 37/100

What Do You Sell?

F (15/100)

In 5 words:

Publishing faqcurrent

Hero

absent

Meta Description

generic

Publisher of academic books in Anthropology, Asian Studies, Business, History, Jewish Studies, Latin American Studies, Law, Literary Studies and Literature, Media Studies, Middle East Studies, Politics, Sociology, Theory and Philosophy.

1 function signals

ICP Clarity

C- (45/100)

Detected audience

decent

Nonprofit / NGO

industryNonprofit / NGO

Positioning Archetype

100% confidence

Community / Movement

Publisher of academic books in Anthropology, Asian Studies, Business, History...

Confidence: 100%

Pricing Page

F (0/100)

No pricing page detected.

How You Compare

vs. other Media / Content / Publishing sites in the index

Dimensionsup.orgkeap.comzight.cominfusionsoft.…managewp.com
Overall6187-2687-2687-2686-25
Clarity1559-44100-8559-44100-85
CTA4575-3060-1575-3075-30
ICP454691-464615+30
1st Impr.2860-3260-3260-3252-24
Pricing095-9580-8095-95100-100

What We Analyzed

Title

Stanford University Press

Word count

826

Track Your Progress

Last scanned 49 days ago. Time to check if your homepage has improved.

sup.org scored 61/100.

We fix exactly this. Messaging, CTAs, positioning. Ready-to-ship, not a slide deck.

Work with us