← All Tools

seattletimes.com

D

36/100

Ranked #41,972 of 46,880 sites

Media / Content / Publishing
D

seattletimes.com

36/100 · #41,972 of 46,880

homepagerankings.com

Media / Content / Publishing Benchmarks

How you compare to 6,908 Media / Content / Publishing sites

Overall
36-26 vs median
Product Clarity
15-28 vs median
CTA Effectiveness
42-15 vs median
ICP Targeting
15-23 vs median
First Impression
24-4 vs median

Gray line = Media / Content / Publishing median

Analysis

Seattletimes scores 36 out of 100 on homepage messaging, earning a D grade — below average — significant gaps in clarity or targeting. Across all 30,134 sites analyzed, that's well below the median of 59. Within Media / Content / Publishing, where the median is 62, Seattletimes lands 26 points below the industry average.

No hero text found. Visitors see nothing above the fold that tells them what you do. With a clarity score of 15, Seattletimes is below the overall median of 36.

The page has 7 CTAs, 5 of them above the fold. That's enough to trigger decision paralysis — when too many buttons compete for attention, visitors often click none. The primary CTA "Contact" is generic — 'Learn more' and 'Get started' don't tell visitors what happens next. CTA effectiveness score: 42 (below the median of 57).

Audience targeting is unclear. Detected audience: Media / Content / Publishing. ICP clarity score: 15 (below the median of 35).

Seattletimes fits the "Price / Value Leader" archetype with moderate confidence.

The biggest opportunities for Seattletimes: Clarity is 21 points below median — the hero text needs to say what the product does in plain language. Audience targeting is weak — adding a "for [specific role/company type]" pattern would sharpen the positioning immediately. CTAs are causing decision paralysis — reduce to one primary action above the fold.

Fix These First

up to +72 pts

Ranked by estimated impact on your overall score

#1

Add a clear hero headline

No hero headline detected — the most important real estate on your page is empty

+22 ptsClarity
#2

Reduce CTAs above the fold to one primary action

5 competing buttons cause decision paralysis — visitors click none

+15 ptsCTA
#3

Add a pricing page

Hiding pricing creates friction — most buyers want to self-qualify before talking to sales

+15 ptsPricing
#4

Make your CTA more specific

"Get started" is generic — tie it to an outcome ("Start building" or "See your report")

+10 ptsCTA
#5

Sharpen your audience targeting

"For businesses" or "for teams" is too broad — name a role, industry, or company type

+10 ptsICP

First Impression

F (24/100)

A visitor would think this is a media / content / publishing for someone that offers something unclear.

What kind of company?clear

Media / Content / Publishing

Who is it for?missing

Unknown

What does it do?missing

Unknown

What's the benefit?missing

None detected

What's the vibe?vague

Neutral

Gaps:

  • -No clear target audience defined. Could be for anyone, which means it resonates with no one.
  • -Product function unclear from above-fold copy. Visitors cannot tell what this does.
  • -No discernible value proposition. The page does not explain why someone should care.

Suggested Rewrites

Better copy based on your product signals — click to copy

Primary CTA

Current

Contact

Tying your CTA to a specific outcome increases click-through

Meta Description

Current

Local news, sports, business, politics, entertainment, travel, restaurants and opinion for Seattle and the Pacific Nort…

This is what shows in Google results — specificity drives higher click-through rates

A/B Test Ideas

Specific experiments to run, ranked by expected impact

Remove all secondary CTAs above the fold — keep only one primary action

5 competing CTAs detected. Single-CTA pages typically convert 20-30% better.

high

Test adding "free" or "no card required" to your primary CTA

Risk-reducing modifiers typically lift click-through 10-15%

medium

Test a "free" modifier on your CTA: "Contact" vs "Contact — Free"

"Free" is the highest-converting modifier across 27K+ homepages analyzed

medium

Test a "Built for [role/company type]" line under your hero

The "for X" pattern is the fastest way to sharpen positioning. Test it as a subheadline.

medium

Test adding social proof above the fold (customer count, logos, or testimonial)

No social proof detected. Even one trust signal ("Join 500+ teams") can lift conversions significantly.

medium

Messaging Clarity

Who is this for?15/100
What problem does this solve?15/100
What does this actually do?15/100
Why this over alternatives?15/100
CTA effectiveness57/100

CTA Analysis

D+ (42/100)
Decision paralysis detected: 5 competing CTAs above the fold

Total CTAs

7

Above Fold

5

Best CTA

Tier 3

Contact
above foldT3 · 57/100
Free Press/Briar Dudley
above foldT3 · 48/100
Free Press/Brier Dudley
T3 · 48/100
Times Watchdog
above foldT3 · 45/100
Subscribe
above foldT3 · 45/100
Books
above foldT5 · 10/100

What Do You Sell?

F (15/100)

Hero

absent

Meta Description

generic

Local news, sports, business, politics, entertainment, travel, restaurants and opinion for Seattle and the Pacific Northwest.

1 function signals

ICP Clarity

F (15/100)

Detected audience

generic

Media / Content / Publishing

industryMedia / Content / Publishing

Positioning Archetype

75% confidence

Price / Value Leader

Local news, sports, business, politics, entertainment, travel, restaurants an...

Confidence: 75%

Pricing Page

F (0/100)

No pricing page detected.

How You Compare

vs. other Media / Content / Publishing sites in the index

Dimensionseattletimes.comkeap.comzight.cominfusionsoft.…managewp.com
Overall3687-5187-5187-5186-50
Clarity1559-44100-8559-44100-85
CTA4275-3360-1875-3375-33
ICP1546-3191-7646-3115
1st Impr.2460-3660-3660-3652-28
Pricing095-9580-8095-95100-100

What We Analyzed

Title

The Seattle Times | Local news, sports, business, politics, entertainment, travel, restaurants and opinion for Seattle and the Pacific Northwest.

Word count

485

Track Your Progress

Last scanned 49 days ago. Time to check if your homepage has improved.

seattletimes.com scored 36/100.

We fix exactly this. Messaging, CTAs, positioning. Ready-to-ship, not a slide deck.

Work with us