Runs-on scores 63 out of 100 on homepage messaging, earning a B- grade — mixed. Across all 30,134 sites analyzed, that's close to the median of 59.

The hero text reads: "Cut your GitHub Actions bill by 90%". Lacks action verbs. The hero does not describe what the product actually does, just makes a vague claim. The language is generic — a visitor can't tell what the product does from the headline alone.

The page has 2 CTAs, 2 of them above the fold. That's a focused set, which avoids overwhelming visitors. The primary CTA "See pricing →" is a value-oriented CTA — it promises a benefit, not just an action. CTA effectiveness score: 80 (above the median of 57).

Audience targeting is unclear. Detected audience: B2B SaaS. ICP clarity score: 15 (below the median of 35).

On the pricing page: Runs-on has a free tier, an annual billing toggle, and social proof elements. 4 pricing tiers is a solid structure. Add a FAQ section to your pricing page. It addresses objections and reduces support load.

The biggest opportunities for Runs-on: Audience targeting is weak — adding a "for [specific role/company type]" pattern would sharpen the positioning immediately.