← All Tools

research.google

C+

64/100

Ranked #15,834 of 46,880 sites

Media / Content / PublishingEnterprise / Public
C+

research.google

64/100 · #15,834 of 46,880

homepagerankings.com

Media / Content / Publishing Benchmarks

How you compare to 6,908 Media / Content / Publishing sites

Overall
64
Product Clarity
72+29 vs median
CTA Effectiveness
45-12 vs median
ICP Targeting
0-38 vs median
First Impression
28

Gray line = Media / Content / Publishing median

Analysis

Research.google scores 64 out of 100 on homepage messaging, earning a C+ grade — mixed. Across all 30,134 sites analyzed, that's above the median of 59.

The hero text reads: "Research to reality". Lacks action verbs. The hero does not describe what the product actually does, just makes a vague claim. The language is generic — a visitor can't tell what the product does from the headline alone. With a clarity score of 72, Research.google is above the overall median of 36.

The page has 10 CTAs, 3 of them above the fold. The primary CTA "Watch Google AI’s wildfire detection technology" is generic — 'Learn more' and 'Get started' don't tell visitors what happens next. CTA effectiveness score: 45 (below the median of 57).

Audience targeting is unclear. Detected audience: Audience not defined on the page. ICP clarity score: 0 (below the median of 35).

Research.google fits the "Community / Movement" archetype with moderate confidence. This means the homepage is rallying users around a mission or identity, not just a product.

The biggest opportunities for Research.google: Audience targeting is weak — adding a "for [specific role/company type]" pattern would sharpen the positioning immediately. CTA effectiveness is below median — consider using action-oriented language ("Start free trial") over generic buttons ("Learn more").

Fix These First

up to +56 pts

Ranked by estimated impact on your overall score

#1

Add a "for [specific audience]" pattern to your hero

Visitors can't tell if this product is for them — specificity wins trust

+18 ptsICP
#2

Add a pricing page

Hiding pricing creates friction — most buyers want to self-qualify before talking to sales

+15 ptsPricing
#3

Make your CTA more specific

"Get started" is generic — tie it to an outcome ("Start building" or "See your report")

+10 ptsCTA
#4

Rewrite your hero headline

Generic language — visitors can't tell what you do from the headline alone

+8 ptsClarity
#5

Shift copy from "we" to "you"

Your above-fold copy says "we" 6x but "you" only 0x — visitors care about their problems, not yours

+5 ptsClarity

First Impression

F (28/100)

A visitor would think this is a nonprofit / ngo for someone that offers something that publishs.

What kind of company?vague

Nonprofit / NGO

Who is it for?missing

Unknown

What does it do?vague

Something that publishs

What's the benefit?vague

Visibility / Insights

What's the vibe?vague

Playful

Gaps:

  • -Business category is implied but not clearly stated.
  • -No clear target audience defined. Could be for anyone, which means it resonates with no one.
  • -Product description is vague. Visitors get a rough idea but no clear picture.
  • -Value proposition is weakly communicated. Benefits are implied, not stated.

Suggested Rewrites

Better copy based on your product signals — click to copy

Hero Headline

Current

Research to reality

Your current headline is generic — these alternatives name what you do for whom

Primary CTA

Current

Watch Google AI’s wildfire detection technology

Tying your CTA to a specific outcome increases click-through

A/B Test Ideas

Specific experiments to run, ranked by expected impact

Test adding "free" or "no card required" to your primary CTA

Risk-reducing modifiers typically lift click-through 10-15%

medium

Test a "free" modifier on your CTA: "Watch Google AI’s wildfi…" vs "Watch Google AI’s wildfi… — Free"

"Free" is the highest-converting modifier across 27K+ homepages analyzed

medium

Test a hero headline that names your product category explicitly

Generic headlines force visitors to scroll to understand what you sell. Test naming the category in the first 5 words.

high

Test adding "for Audience not defined on the page" to your hero or subheadline

Naming your audience explicitly increases relevance. Visitors self-qualify faster when they see themselves.

high

Rewrite above-fold copy from "we" language to "you" language

Your copy says "we" 6x and "you" 0x. Visitor-centric copy typically converts better.

medium

Messaging Clarity

Who is this for?58/100
What problem does this solve?66/100
What does this actually do?92/100
Why this over alternatives?58/100
CTA effectiveness37/100

CTA Analysis

C- (45/100)

Total CTAs

10

Above Fold

3

Best CTA

Tier 3

Watch Google AI’s wildfire detection technology
T3 · 45/100
Learn more about our Philosophy Learn more
above foldT4 · 37/100
Learn more about our People Learn more
above foldT4 · 37/100
Learn more about our Projects Learn more
T4 · 37/100
Learn more about our Publications Learn more
T4 · 37/100
Learn more about our Resources Learn more
T4 · 37/100

What Do You Sell?

B+ (72/100)

In 5 words:

Software to discover google

Hero

generic

Research to reality

Meta Description

specific

Discover Google Research. We publish research papers across a wide range of domains and share our latest developments in AI and science research.

7 function signalsDetected: software

ICP Clarity

F (0/100)

Detected audience

absent

Audience not defined on the page

Positioning Archetype

60% confidence

Community / Movement

Research to reality

Confidence: 60%

Pricing Page

F (0/100)

No pricing page detected.

How You Compare

vs. other Media / Content / Publishing sites in the index

Dimensionresearch.googlekeap.comzight.cominfusionsoft.…managewp.com
Overall6487-2387-2387-2386-22
Clarity7259+13100-2859+13100-28
CTA4575-3060-1575-3075-30
ICP046-4691-9146-4615-15
1st Impr.2860-3260-3260-3252-24
Pricing095-9580-8095-95100-100

What We Analyzed

Title

Google Research - Explore Our Latest Research in Science and AI

Word count

1,228

Hero text

Research to reality

Track Your Progress

Last scanned 49 days ago. Time to check if your homepage has improved.

research.google scored 64/100.

We fix exactly this. Messaging, CTAs, positioning. Ready-to-ship, not a slide deck.

Work with us