publico.pt
56/100
Ranked #27,805 of 46,880 sites
publico.pt
56/100 · #27,805 of 46,880
homepagerankings.com
Media / Content / Publishing Benchmarks
How you compare to 6,908 Media / Content / Publishing sites
Gray line = Media / Content / Publishing median
Analysis
Publico.pt scores 56 out of 100 on homepage messaging, earning a C grade — average — basic messaging is present but generic. Across all 30,134 sites analyzed, that's close to the median of 59. Within Media / Content / Publishing, where the median is 62, Publico.pt lands 6 points below the industry average.
The hero text reads: "PÚBLICO". Lacks action verbs. The hero does not describe what the product actually does, just makes a vague claim. The language is generic — a visitor can't tell what the product does from the headline alone.
The page has 2 CTAs, 1 of them above the fold. That's a focused set, which avoids overwhelming visitors. The primary CTA "Facebook" is high-friction — asking for commitment before proving value. CTA effectiveness score: 15 (below the median of 57).
Audience targeting is unclear. Detected audience: Media / Content / Publishing. ICP clarity score: 15 (below the median of 35).
The biggest opportunities for Publico.pt: CTA effectiveness is below median — consider using action-oriented language ("Start free trial") over generic buttons ("Learn more"). Audience targeting is weak — adding a "for [specific role/company type]" pattern would sharpen the positioning immediately. First impression clarity is below median — visitors can't quickly tell what category this product falls into.
Fix These First
up to +69 ptsRanked by estimated impact on your overall score
Upgrade your primary CTA from "Facebook"
Passive CTAs like "Learn more" don't tell visitors what happens next
Close first-impression gaps
Visitors can't quickly tell who it's for and what it does — those signals should be above the fold
Add a pricing page
Hiding pricing creates friction — most buyers want to self-qualify before talking to sales
Rewrite your hero headline
Generic language — visitors can't tell what you do from the headline alone
Sharpen your audience targeting
"For businesses" or "for teams" is too broad — name a role, industry, or company type
First Impression
F (12/100)“A visitor would think this is a media / content / publishing for someone that offers something unclear.”
Media / Content / Publishing
Unknown
Unknown
None detected
Neutral
Gaps:
- -Business category is implied but not clearly stated.
- -No clear target audience defined. Could be for anyone, which means it resonates with no one.
- -Product function unclear from above-fold copy. Visitors cannot tell what this does.
- -No discernible value proposition. The page does not explain why someone should care.
Suggested Rewrites
Better copy based on your product signals — click to copy
Current
Passive CTAs like this don't tell visitors what happens next
Current
Notícias, opinião plural, investigação, edição impressa, newsletters, jogos. Pense bem, pense PÚBLICO
This is what shows in Google results — specificity drives higher click-through rates
A/B Test Ideas
Specific experiments to run, ranked by expected impact
Replace "Facebook" with an outcome-specific CTA
Passive CTAs leave visitors guessing. Test: "See your report" or "Start building — free"
Test a "free" modifier on your CTA: "Facebook" vs "Facebook — Free"
"Free" is the highest-converting modifier across 27K+ homepages analyzed
Test a hero headline that names your product category explicitly
Generic headlines force visitors to scroll to understand what you sell. Test naming the category in the first 5 words.
Test a "Built for [role/company type]" line under your hero
The "for X" pattern is the fastest way to sharpen positioning. Test it as a subheadline.
Test adding social proof above the fold (customer count, logos, or testimonial)
No social proof detected. Even one trust signal ("Join 500+ teams") can lift conversions significantly.
Messaging Clarity
CTA Analysis
F (15/100)Total CTAs
2
Above Fold
1
Best CTA
Tier 5
What Do You Sell?
F (29/100)Hero
genericPÚBLICO
Meta Description
genericNotícias, opinião plural, investigação, edição impressa, newsletters, jogos. Pense bem, pense PÚBLICO
ICP Clarity
F (15/100)Detected audience
genericMedia / Content / Publishing
Pricing Page
F (0/100)No pricing page detected.
How You Compare
vs. other Media / Content / Publishing sites in the index
| Dimension | publico.pt | keap.com | zight.com | infusionsoft.… | managewp.com |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 56 | 87-31 | 87-31 | 87-31 | 86-30 |
| Clarity | 29 | 59-30 | 100-71 | 59-30 | 100-71 |
| CTA | 15 | 75-60 | 60-45 | 75-60 | 75-60 |
| ICP | 15 | 46-31 | 91-76 | 46-31 | 15 |
| 1st Impr. | 12 | 60-48 | 60-48 | 60-48 | 52-40 |
| Pricing | 0 | 95-95 | 80-80 | 95-95 | 100-100 |
What We Analyzed
Title
PÚBLICO – Abrir portas onde se erguem muros
Word count
3,107
Hero text
PÚBLICO
More in Media / Content / Publishing
View Media / Content / Publishing benchmarks →Track Your Progress
Last scanned 49 days ago. Time to check if your homepage has improved.
publico.pt scored 56/100.
We fix exactly this. Messaging, CTAs, positioning. Ready-to-ship, not a slide deck.
Work with us