prtimes.jp
61/100
Ranked #20,632 of 46,880 sites
prtimes.jp
61/100 · #20,632 of 46,880
homepagerankings.com
B2C SaaS / Consumer App Benchmarks
How you compare to 3,549 B2C SaaS / Consumer App sites
Gray line = B2C SaaS / Consumer App median
Analysis
Prtimes.jp scores 61 out of 100 on homepage messaging, earning a C grade — average — basic messaging is present but generic. Across all 30,134 sites analyzed, that's close to the median of 59.
The hero text reads: "プレスリリース・ニュースリリース配信サービスのPR TIMES". Lacks action verbs. The hero does not describe what the product actually does, just makes a vague claim. The language is generic — a visitor can't tell what the product does from the headline alone. With a clarity score of 19, Prtimes.jp is below the overall median of 36.
The page has 3 CTAs, 1 of them above the fold. That's a focused set, which avoids overwhelming visitors. The primary CTA "VectorBuilderが遺伝子治療用の高安定性MuteFree™ AAVを発表16分前" is generic — 'Learn more' and 'Get started' don't tell visitors what happens next.
Audience targeting is unclear. Detected audience: Audience not defined on the page. ICP clarity score: 0 (below the median of 35).
On the pricing page: Enter your pricing page URL directly (try https://prtimes.jp/pricing) for a full analysis.
The biggest opportunities for Prtimes.jp: Audience targeting is weak — adding a "for [specific role/company type]" pattern would sharpen the positioning immediately. Clarity is 17 points below median — the hero text needs to say what the product does in plain language. First impression clarity is below median — visitors can't quickly tell what category this product falls into.
Fix These First
up to +69 ptsRanked by estimated impact on your overall score
Rewrite your hero headline
Generic language — visitors can't tell what you do from the headline alone
Add a "for [specific audience]" pattern to your hero
Visitors can't tell if this product is for them — specificity wins trust
Close first-impression gaps
Visitors can't quickly tell who it's for and what it does — those signals should be above the fold
Make your CTA more specific
"Get started" is generic — tie it to an outcome ("Start building" or "See your report")
Add a CTA to your pricing page
Pricing page has no clear call-to-action — visitors can't convert
First Impression
F (12/100)“A visitor would think this is a b2b saas for someone that offers something unclear.”
B2B SaaS
Unknown
Unknown
None detected
Neutral
Gaps:
- -Business category is implied but not clearly stated.
- -No clear target audience defined. Could be for anyone, which means it resonates with no one.
- -Product function unclear from above-fold copy. Visitors cannot tell what this does.
- -No discernible value proposition. The page does not explain why someone should care.
Suggested Rewrites
Better copy based on your product signals — click to copy
Current
VectorBuilderが遺伝子治療用の高安定性MuteFree™ AAVを発表16分前
Tying your CTA to a specific outcome increases click-through
Current
プレスリリースをPR TIMESで配信して、効果的なPRを実現。上場企業の63.9％(2,585社／4,045社)が利用する現在シェアNo.1のプレスリリース配信代行サービス。話題のベンチャー～グローバル企業のニュースリリースが集まる生活…
This is what shows in Google results — specificity drives higher click-through rates
A/B Test Ideas
Specific experiments to run, ranked by expected impact
Test adding "free" or "no card required" to your primary CTA
Risk-reducing modifiers typically lift click-through 10-15%
Test a hero headline that names your product category explicitly
Generic headlines force visitors to scroll to understand what you sell. Test naming the category in the first 5 words.
Test adding "for Audience not defined on the page" to your hero or subheadline
Naming your audience explicitly increases relevance. Visitors self-qualify faster when they see themselves.
Test adding an annual/monthly billing toggle with a discount
Annual billing toggles with visible savings ("Save 20%") are a standard conversion lever.
Test adding a one-line product description directly under your hero
Visitors can't tell what you do from the above-fold content. A single explanatory line can fix this.
Messaging Clarity
CTA Analysis
C- (48/100)Total CTAs
3
Above Fold
1
Best CTA
Tier 3
What Do You Sell?
F (19/100)In 5 words:
PR TIMES｜プレスリリース・ニュースリリースNo.1配信サービス
Hero
genericプレスリリース・ニュースリリース配信サービスのPR TIMES
Meta Description
genericプレスリリースをPR TIMESで配信して、効果的なPRを実現。上場企業の63.9％(2,585社／4,045社)が利用する現在シェアNo.1のプレスリリース配信代行サービス。話題のベンチャー～グローバル企業のニュースリリースが集まる生活者も要注目のサイトです。プレスリリースの受信は無料です。
ICP Clarity
F (0/100)Detected audience
absentAudience not defined on the page
Pricing Page
F (15/100)How You Compare
vs. other B2C SaaS / Consumer App sites in the index
| Dimension | prtimes.jp | traveljoy.com | sendcloud.com | brainstormfor… | newzenler.com |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 61 | 89-28 | 88-27 | 87-26 | 87-26 |
| Clarity | 19 | 59-40 | 72-53 | 87-68 | 72-53 |
| CTA | 48 | 85-37 | 85-37 | 60-12 | 90-42 |
| ICP | 0 | 58-58 | 90-90 | 84-84 | 90-90 |
| 1st Impr. | 12 | 78-66 | 52-40 | 40-28 | 40-28 |
| Pricing | 15 | 80-65 | 80-65 | 0+15 | 100-85 |
What We Analyzed
Title
PR TIMES｜プレスリリース・ニュースリリースNo.1配信サービス
Word count
120
Hero text
プレスリリース・ニュースリリース配信サービスのPR TIMES
More in B2C SaaS / Consumer App
View B2C SaaS / Consumer App benchmarks →Track Your Progress
Last scanned 49 days ago. Time to check if your homepage has improved.
prtimes.jp scored 61/100.
We fix exactly this. Messaging, CTAs, positioning. Ready-to-ship, not a slide deck.
Work with us