procyclingstats.com
38/100
Ranked #39,929 of 46,880 sites
procyclingstats.com
38/100 · #39,929 of 46,880
homepagerankings.com
B2C SaaS / Consumer App Benchmarks
How you compare to 3,549 B2C SaaS / Consumer App sites
Gray line = B2C SaaS / Consumer App median
Analysis
Procyclingstats scores 38 out of 100 on homepage messaging, earning a D grade — below average — significant gaps in clarity or targeting. Across all 30,134 sites analyzed, that's well below the median of 59. Within B2C SaaS / Consumer App, where the median is 64, Procyclingstats lands 26 points below the industry average.
No hero text found. Visitors see nothing above the fold that tells them what you do. With a clarity score of 21, Procyclingstats is below the overall median of 36.
The page has 9 CTAs, 1 of them above the fold. The primary CTA "Start" is a value-oriented CTA — it promises a benefit, not just an action. CTA effectiveness score: 75 (above the median of 57).
Audience targeting is unclear. Detected audience: team. Role words found: "team". ICP clarity score: 15 (below the median of 35).
The biggest opportunities for Procyclingstats: Audience targeting is weak — adding a "for [specific role/company type]" pattern would sharpen the positioning immediately. Clarity is 15 points below median — the hero text needs to say what the product does in plain language. First impression clarity is below median — visitors can't quickly tell what category this product falls into.
Fix These First
up to +59 ptsRanked by estimated impact on your overall score
Add a clear hero headline
No hero headline detected — the most important real estate on your page is empty
Add a pricing page
Hiding pricing creates friction — most buyers want to self-qualify before talking to sales
Sharpen your audience targeting
"For businesses" or "for teams" is too broad — name a role, industry, or company type
Close first-impression gaps
Visitors can't quickly tell who it's for and what it does — those signals should be above the fold
Rewrite your meta description
Generic meta description — this is what shows up in Google results
First Impression
F (20/100)“A visitor would think this is a b2b saas for someone that offers something unclear.”
B2B SaaS
Unknown
Unknown
Status / Identity / Belonging
Neutral
Gaps:
- -Business category is implied but not clearly stated.
- -No clear target audience defined. Could be for anyone, which means it resonates with no one.
- -Product function unclear from above-fold copy. Visitors cannot tell what this does.
- -Value proposition is weakly communicated. Benefits are implied, not stated.
Suggested Rewrites
Better copy based on your product signals — click to copy
Current
Find results of cyclings top riders like Tadej Pogacar, Remco Evenepoel and Mathieu van der Poel. Detailed statistics a…
This is what shows in Google results — specificity drives higher click-through rates
A/B Test Ideas
Specific experiments to run, ranked by expected impact
Test a "Built for [role/company type]" line under your hero
The "for X" pattern is the fastest way to sharpen positioning. Test it as a subheadline.
Test adding social proof above the fold (customer count, logos, or testimonial)
No social proof detected. Even one trust signal ("Join 500+ teams") can lift conversions significantly.
Test adding a one-line product description directly under your hero
Visitors can't tell what you do from the above-fold content. A single explanatory line can fix this.
Messaging Clarity
CTA Analysis
A- (75/100)Total CTAs
9
Above Fold
1
Best CTA
Tier 2
What Do You Sell?
F (21/100)In 5 words:
Score terminology
Hero
absentMeta Description
genericFind results of cyclings top riders like Tadej Pogacar, Remco Evenepoel and Mathieu van der Poel. Detailed statistics about the Tour de France, Giro d'Italia and classics like Paris-Roubaix or Tour of Flanders.
ICP Clarity
F (15/100)Detected audience
genericteam
Pricing Page
F (0/100)No pricing page detected.
How You Compare
vs. other B2C SaaS / Consumer App sites in the index
| Dimension | procyclingstats.c… | traveljoy.com | sendcloud.com | brainstormfor… | newzenler.com |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 38 | 89-51 | 88-50 | 87-49 | 87-49 |
| Clarity | 21 | 59-38 | 72-51 | 87-66 | 72-51 |
| CTA | 75 | 85-10 | 85-10 | 60+15 | 90-15 |
| ICP | 15 | 58-43 | 90-75 | 84-69 | 90-75 |
| 1st Impr. | 20 | 78-58 | 52-32 | 40-20 | 40-20 |
| Pricing | 0 | 80-80 | 80-80 | 0 | 100-100 |
What We Analyzed
Title
Cycling statistics, results and rankings | ProCyclingStats.com
Word count
1,316
More in B2C SaaS / Consumer App
View B2C SaaS / Consumer App benchmarks →Track Your Progress
Last scanned 49 days ago. Time to check if your homepage has improved.
procyclingstats.com scored 38/100.
We fix exactly this. Messaging, CTAs, positioning. Ready-to-ship, not a slide deck.
Work with us