pixiv.net
37/100
Ranked #41,017 of 46,880 sites
pixiv.net
37/100 · #41,017 of 46,880
homepagerankings.com
Media / Content / Publishing Benchmarks
How you compare to 6,908 Media / Content / Publishing sites
Gray line = Media / Content / Publishing median
Analysis
Pixiv scores 37 out of 100 on homepage messaging, earning a D grade — below average — significant gaps in clarity or targeting. Across all 30,134 sites analyzed, that's well below the median of 59. Within Media / Content / Publishing, where the median is 62, Pixiv lands 25 points below the industry average.
No hero text found. Visitors see nothing above the fold that tells them what you do. With a clarity score of 17, Pixiv is below the overall median of 36.
The page has 3 CTAs, 3 of them above the fold. That's a focused set, which avoids overwhelming visitors. The primary CTA "Facebookで続ける" is high-friction — asking for commitment before proving value. CTA effectiveness score: 10 (below the median of 57).
Audience targeting is decent — there are audience signals, but room to be more specific. Detected audience: enterprise, B2B SaaS.
The biggest opportunities for Pixiv: CTA effectiveness is below median — consider using action-oriented language ("Start free trial") over generic buttons ("Learn more"). Clarity is 19 points below median — the hero text needs to say what the product does in plain language. First impression clarity is below median — visitors can't quickly tell what category this product falls into.
Fix These First
up to +71 ptsRanked by estimated impact on your overall score
Add a clear hero headline
No hero headline detected — the most important real estate on your page is empty
Upgrade your primary CTA from "Facebookで続ける"
Passive CTAs like "Learn more" don't tell visitors what happens next
Close first-impression gaps
Visitors can't quickly tell who it's for and what it does — those signals should be above the fold
Add a pricing page
Hiding pricing creates friction — most buyers want to self-qualify before talking to sales
Rewrite your meta description
Generic meta description — this is what shows up in Google results
First Impression
F (12/100)“A visitor would think this is a b2b saas for someone that offers something unclear.”
B2B SaaS
Unknown
Unknown
None detected
Professional
Gaps:
- -Business category is implied but not clearly stated.
- -No clear target audience defined. Could be for anyone, which means it resonates with no one.
- -Product function unclear from above-fold copy. Visitors cannot tell what this does.
- -No discernible value proposition. The page does not explain why someone should care.
Suggested Rewrites
Better copy based on your product signals — click to copy
Current
Facebookで続ける
Passive CTAs like this don't tell visitors what happens next
Current
pixiv(ピクシブ)は、イラスト・マンガ・小説の投稿や閲覧が楽しめる国内最大級の作品コミュニケーションサービスです。幅広いジャンルの作品が投稿され、ユーザー発の企画や公式コンテストが開催されています。
This is what shows in Google results — specificity drives higher click-through rates
A/B Test Ideas
Specific experiments to run, ranked by expected impact
Replace "Facebookで続ける" with an outcome-specific CTA
Passive CTAs leave visitors guessing. Test: "See your report" or "Start building — free"
Test a "free" modifier on your CTA: "Facebookで続ける" vs "Facebookで続ける — Free"
"Free" is the highest-converting modifier across 27K+ homepages analyzed
Test adding social proof above the fold (customer count, logos, or testimonial)
No social proof detected. Even one trust signal ("Join 500+ teams") can lift conversions significantly.
Test adding a one-line product description directly under your hero
Visitors can't tell what you do from the above-fold content. A single explanatory line can fix this.
Messaging Clarity
CTA Analysis
F (10/100)Total CTAs
3
Above Fold
3
Best CTA
Tier 5
What Do You Sell?
F (17/100)Hero
absentMeta Description
genericpixiv(ピクシブ)は、イラスト・マンガ・小説の投稿や閲覧が楽しめる国内最大級の作品コミュニケーションサービスです。幅広いジャンルの作品が投稿され、ユーザー発の企画や公式コンテストが開催されています。
ICP Clarity
D+ (38/100)Detected audience
decententerprise, B2B SaaS
Pricing Page
F (0/100)No pricing page detected.
How You Compare
vs. other Media / Content / Publishing sites in the index
| Dimension | pixiv.net | keap.com | zight.com | infusionsoft.… | managewp.com |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 37 | 87-50 | 87-50 | 87-50 | 86-49 |
| Clarity | 17 | 59-42 | 100-83 | 59-42 | 100-83 |
| CTA | 10 | 75-65 | 60-50 | 75-65 | 75-65 |
| ICP | 38 | 46-8 | 91-53 | 46-8 | 15+23 |
| 1st Impr. | 12 | 60-48 | 60-48 | 60-48 | 52-40 |
| Pricing | 0 | 95-95 | 80-80 | 95-95 | 100-100 |
What We Analyzed
Title
イラスト・マンガ・小説 作品コミュニケーションサービス [pixiv(ピクシブ)]
Word count
26
More in Media / Content / Publishing
View Media / Content / Publishing benchmarks →Track Your Progress
Last scanned 13 days ago. If you've made changes, re-scan to see how your score moved.
pixiv.net scored 37/100.
We fix exactly this. Messaging, CTAs, positioning. Ready-to-ship, not a slide deck.
Work with us