jumbo.com
54/100
Ranked #29,699 of 46,880 sites
jumbo.com
54/100 · #29,699 of 46,880
homepagerankings.com
Media / Content / Publishing Benchmarks
How you compare to 6,908 Media / Content / Publishing sites
Gray line = Media / Content / Publishing median
Analysis
Jumbo scores 54 out of 100 on homepage messaging, earning a C- grade — mixed. Across all 30,134 sites analyzed, that's below the median of 59. Within Media / Content / Publishing, where the median is 62, Jumbo lands 8 points below the industry average.
No hero text found. Visitors see nothing above the fold that tells them what you do. With a clarity score of 17, Jumbo is below the overall median of 36.
The page has 3 CTAs. That's a focused set, which avoids overwhelming visitors. The primary CTA "Download onze app" is generic — 'Learn more' and 'Get started' don't tell visitors what happens next. CTA effectiveness score: 45 (below the median of 57).
Audience targeting is unclear. Detected audience: Audience not defined on the page. ICP clarity score: 0 (below the median of 35).
The biggest opportunities for Jumbo: Audience targeting is weak — adding a "for [specific role/company type]" pattern would sharpen the positioning immediately. Clarity is 19 points below median — the hero text needs to say what the product does in plain language. CTA effectiveness is below median — consider using action-oriented language ("Start free trial") over generic buttons ("Learn more").
Fix These First
up to +73 ptsRanked by estimated impact on your overall score
Add a clear hero headline
No hero headline detected — the most important real estate on your page is empty
Add a "for [specific audience]" pattern to your hero
Visitors can't tell if this product is for them — specificity wins trust
Add a pricing page
Hiding pricing creates friction — most buyers want to self-qualify before talking to sales
Make your CTA more specific
"Get started" is generic — tie it to an outcome ("Start building" or "See your report")
Close first-impression gaps
Visitors can't quickly tell who it's for and why it matters — those signals should be above the fold
First Impression
F (20/100)“A visitor would think this is a b2b saas for someone that offers app.”
B2B SaaS
Unknown
app
None detected
Neutral
Gaps:
- -Business category is implied but not clearly stated.
- -No clear target audience defined. Could be for anyone, which means it resonates with no one.
- -Product description is vague. Visitors get a rough idea but no clear picture.
- -No discernible value proposition. The page does not explain why someone should care.
Suggested Rewrites
Better copy based on your product signals — click to copy
Current
Download onze app
Tying your CTA to a specific outcome increases click-through
Current
Ontdek het ruime assortiment van Jumbo! ✓ Altijd lage prijzen ✓ Boodschappen thuisbezorgen ✓ Heerlijke recepten ✓ Handi…
This is what shows in Google results — specificity drives higher click-through rates
A/B Test Ideas
Specific experiments to run, ranked by expected impact
Test adding "free" or "no card required" to your primary CTA
Risk-reducing modifiers typically lift click-through 10-15%
Test a "free" modifier on your CTA: "Download onze app" vs "Download onze app — Free"
"Free" is the highest-converting modifier across 27K+ homepages analyzed
Test adding "for Audience not defined on the page" to your hero or subheadline
Naming your audience explicitly increases relevance. Visitors self-qualify faster when they see themselves.
Test adding social proof above the fold (customer count, logos, or testimonial)
No social proof detected. Even one trust signal ("Join 500+ teams") can lift conversions significantly.
Messaging Clarity
CTA Analysis
C- (45/100)Total CTAs
3
Above Fold
0
Best CTA
Tier 3
What Do You Sell?
F (17/100)Hero
absentMeta Description
genericOntdek het ruime assortiment van Jumbo! ✓ Altijd lage prijzen ✓ Boodschappen thuisbezorgen ✓ Heerlijke recepten ✓ Handige Jumbo app
ICP Clarity
F (0/100)Detected audience
absentAudience not defined on the page
Pricing Page
F (0/100)No pricing page detected.
How You Compare
vs. other Media / Content / Publishing sites in the index
| Dimension | jumbo.com | keap.com | zight.com | infusionsoft.… | managewp.com |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 54 | 87-33 | 87-33 | 87-33 | 86-32 |
| Clarity | 17 | 59-42 | 100-83 | 59-42 | 100-83 |
| CTA | 45 | 75-30 | 60-15 | 75-30 | 75-30 |
| ICP | 0 | 46-46 | 91-91 | 46-46 | 15-15 |
| 1st Impr. | 20 | 60-40 | 60-40 | 60-40 | 52-32 |
| Pricing | 0 | 95-95 | 80-80 | 95-95 | 100-100 |
What We Analyzed
Title
Altijd lage prijzen op je dagelijkse boodschappen | Jumbo
Word count
628
More in Media / Content / Publishing
View Media / Content / Publishing benchmarks →Track Your Progress
Last scanned 49 days ago. Time to check if your homepage has improved.
jumbo.com scored 54/100.
We fix exactly this. Messaging, CTAs, positioning. Ready-to-ship, not a slide deck.
Work with us