jacobin.com
42/100
Ranked #36,378 of 46,880 sites
jacobin.com
42/100 · #36,378 of 46,880
homepagerankings.com
Media / Content / Publishing Benchmarks
How you compare to 6,908 Media / Content / Publishing sites
Gray line = Media / Content / Publishing median
Analysis
Jacobin scores 42 out of 100 on homepage messaging, earning a D+ grade — mixed. Across all 30,134 sites analyzed, that's well below the median of 59. Within Media / Content / Publishing, where the median is 62, Jacobin lands 20 points below the industry average.
The hero text reads: "Jacobin". Lacks action verbs. The hero does not describe what the product actually does, just makes a vague claim. The language is generic — a visitor can't tell what the product does from the headline alone.
The page has 6 CTAs, 2 of them above the fold. The primary CTA "Start a New Subscription" is a value-oriented CTA — it promises a benefit, not just an action. CTA effectiveness score: 75 (above the median of 57).
Audience targeting is unclear. Detected audience: Audience not defined on the page. ICP clarity score: 0 (below the median of 35).
On the pricing page: Jacobin has a free tier. 4 pricing tiers is a solid structure. Add a FAQ section to your pricing page. It addresses objections and reduces support load.
The biggest opportunities for Jacobin: Audience targeting is weak — adding a "for [specific role/company type]" pattern would sharpen the positioning immediately. First impression clarity is below median — visitors can't quickly tell what category this product falls into. Clarity is 9 points below median — the hero text needs to say what the product does in plain language.
Fix These First
up to +58 ptsRanked by estimated impact on your overall score
Add a "for [specific audience]" pattern to your hero
Visitors can't tell if this product is for them — specificity wins trust
Rewrite your hero headline
Generic language — visitors can't tell what you do from the headline alone
Close first-impression gaps
Visitors can't quickly tell who it's for and what it does — those signals should be above the fold
Shift copy from "we" to "you"
Your above-fold copy says "we" 6x but "you" only 1x — visitors care about their problems, not yours
Rewrite your meta description
Generic meta description — this is what shows up in Google results
First Impression
F (12/100)“A visitor would think this is a b2b saas for someone that offers something unclear.”
B2B SaaS
Unknown
Unknown
None detected
Neutral
Gaps:
- -Business category is implied but not clearly stated.
- -No clear target audience defined. Could be for anyone, which means it resonates with no one.
- -Product function unclear from above-fold copy. Visitors cannot tell what this does.
- -No discernible value proposition. The page does not explain why someone should care.
Suggested Rewrites
Better copy based on your product signals — click to copy
Current
Jacobin
Your current headline is generic — these alternatives name what you do for whom
Current
Reason in Revolt
This is what shows in Google results — specificity drives higher click-through rates
A/B Test Ideas
Specific experiments to run, ranked by expected impact
Test a hero headline that names your product category explicitly
Generic headlines force visitors to scroll to understand what you sell. Test naming the category in the first 5 words.
Test adding "for Audience not defined on the page" to your hero or subheadline
Naming your audience explicitly increases relevance. Visitors self-qualify faster when they see themselves.
Rewrite above-fold copy from "we" language to "you" language
Your copy says "we" 6x and "you" 1x. Visitor-centric copy typically converts better.
Test reducing pricing tiers from 4 to 3
Too many options cause choice paralysis. The ideal is 3 tiers with a highlighted recommended plan.
Test adding an annual/monthly billing toggle with a discount
Annual billing toggles with visible savings ("Save 20%") are a standard conversion lever.
Messaging Clarity
CTA Analysis
B (75/100)Total CTAs
6
Above Fold
2
Best CTA
Tier 2
What Do You Sell?
F (27/100)In 5 words:
Report that
Hero
genericJacobin
Meta Description
genericReason in Revolt
ICP Clarity
F (0/100)Detected audience
absentAudience not defined on the page
Pricing Page
A+ (95/100)4 pricing tiers detected
How You Compare
vs. other Media / Content / Publishing sites in the index
| Dimension | jacobin.com | keap.com | zight.com | infusionsoft.… | managewp.com |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 42 | 87-45 | 87-45 | 87-45 | 86-44 |
| Clarity | 27 | 59-32 | 100-73 | 59-32 | 100-73 |
| CTA | 75 | 75 | 60+15 | 75 | 75 |
| ICP | 0 | 46-46 | 91-91 | 46-46 | 15-15 |
| 1st Impr. | 12 | 60-48 | 60-48 | 60-48 | 52-40 |
| Pricing | 95 | 95 | 80+15 | 95 | 100-5 |
What We Analyzed
Title
Jacobin
Word count
970
Hero text
Jacobin
More in Media / Content / Publishing
View Media / Content / Publishing benchmarks →Track Your Progress
Last scanned 63 days ago. Time to check if your homepage has improved.
jacobin.com scored 42/100.
We fix exactly this. Messaging, CTAs, positioning. Ready-to-ship, not a slide deck.
Work with us