← All Tools

ewg.org

C+

64/100

Ranked #15,662 of 46,880 sites

Nonprofit / NGO
C+

ewg.org

64/100 · #15,662 of 46,880

homepagerankings.com

Nonprofit / NGO Benchmarks

How you compare to 468 Nonprofit / NGO sites

Overall
64
Product Clarity
59+17 vs median
CTA Effectiveness
62+5 vs median
ICP Targeting
63+18 vs median
First Impression
32+4 vs median

Gray line = Nonprofit / NGO median

Analysis

Ewg scores 64 out of 100 on homepage messaging, earning a C+ grade — mixed. Across all 30,134 sites analyzed, that's above the median of 59.

The hero text reads: "JUST RELEASED". Lacks action verbs. The hero does not describe what the product actually does, just makes a vague claim. The language is generic — a visitor can't tell what the product does from the headline alone. With a clarity score of 59, Ewg is above the overall median of 36.

The page has 2 CTAs, 1 of them above the fold. That's a focused set, which avoids overwhelming visitors. The primary CTA "Contact Us" is generic — 'Learn more' and 'Get started' don't tell visitors what happens next.

Audience targeting is decent — there are audience signals, but room to be more specific. Detected audience: nonprofit, Nonprofit / NGO, creator and team. Role words found: "creator", "team". The site uses a "for [X]" pattern: "use in food sold in the U". ICP clarity score: 63 (above the median of 35).

Ewg fits the "Community / Movement" archetype with high confidence. This means the homepage is rallying users around a mission or identity, not just a product.

Fix These First

up to +38 pts

Ranked by estimated impact on your overall score

#1

Add a pricing page

Hiding pricing creates friction — most buyers want to self-qualify before talking to sales

+15 ptsPricing
#2

Rewrite your hero headline

Generic language — visitors can't tell what you do from the headline alone

+8 ptsClarity
#3

Close first-impression gaps

Visitors can't quickly tell who it's for and what it does — those signals should be above the fold

+6 ptsFirst Impression
#4

Shift copy from "we" to "you"

Your above-fold copy says "we" 14x but "you" only 5x — visitors care about their problems, not yours

+5 ptsClarity
#5

Rewrite your meta description

Generic meta description — this is what shows up in Google results

+4 ptsClarity

First Impression

F (32/100)

A visitor would think this is a nonprofit / ngo for someone that offers something unclear.

What kind of company?clear

Nonprofit / NGO

Who is it for?missing

Unknown

What does it do?missing

Unknown

What's the benefit?vague

Cost Savings / Money

What's the vibe?vague

Casual

Gaps:

  • -No clear target audience defined. Could be for anyone, which means it resonates with no one.
  • -Product function unclear from above-fold copy. Visitors cannot tell what this does.
  • -Value proposition is weakly communicated. Benefits are implied, not stated.

Suggested Rewrites

Better copy based on your product signals — click to copy

Hero Headline

Current

JUST RELEASED

Your current headline is generic — these alternatives name what you do for whom

Primary CTA

Current

Contact Us

Tying your CTA to a specific outcome increases click-through

Meta Description

Current

The Environmental Working Group is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to helping you live your healthiest …

This is what shows in Google results — specificity drives higher click-through rates

A/B Test Ideas

Specific experiments to run, ranked by expected impact

Test adding "free" or "no card required" to your primary CTA

Risk-reducing modifiers typically lift click-through 10-15%

medium

Test a "free" modifier on your CTA: "Contact Us" vs "Contact Us — Free"

"Free" is the highest-converting modifier across 27K+ homepages analyzed

medium

Test a hero headline that names your product category explicitly

Generic headlines force visitors to scroll to understand what you sell. Test naming the category in the first 5 words.

high

Rewrite above-fold copy from "we" language to "you" language

Your copy says "we" 14x and "you" 5x. Visitor-centric copy typically converts better.

medium

Test adding social proof above the fold (customer count, logos, or testimonial)

No social proof detected. Even one trust signal ("Join 500+ teams") can lift conversions significantly.

medium

Messaging Clarity

Who is this for?66/100
What problem does this solve?40/100
What does this actually do?77/100
Why this over alternatives?58/100
CTA effectiveness57/100

CTA Analysis

B- (62/100)

Total CTAs

2

Above Fold

1

Best CTA

Tier 3

Contact Us
above foldT3 · 57/100
Facebook
T5 · 10/100

What Do You Sell?

C+ (59/100)

In 5 words:

Database to search menu

Hero

generic

JUST RELEASED

Meta Description

generic

The Environmental Working Group is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to helping you live your healthiest life.

5 function signalsDetected: database

ICP Clarity

B- (63/100)

Detected audience

decent

nonprofit, Nonprofit / NGO, creator and team

creatorteamnonprofit
rolecreator
roleteam
company_sizenonprofit
industryNonprofit / NGO
use_casehelp you learn about the hidden health dangers in your food

Positioning Archetype

85% confidence

Community / Movement

JUST RELEASED

Confidence: 85%

Pricing Page

F (0/100)

No pricing page detected.

How You Compare

vs. other Nonprofit / NGO sites in the index

Dimensionewg.orgmarathondatac…clubexpress.c…trustandwill.…webcurate.co
Overall6480-1678-1478-1478-14
Clarity59100-4172-1387-2872-13
CTA6280-1870-86079-17
ICP6315+4858+553+1040+23
1st Impr.3252-2048-162820+12
Pricing0100-10095-9595-9570-70

What We Analyzed

Title

Environmental Working Group – JUST RELEASED | Environmental Working Group

Word count

839

Hero text

JUST RELEASED

Track Your Progress

Last scanned 49 days ago. Time to check if your homepage has improved.

ewg.org scored 64/100.

We fix exactly this. Messaging, CTAs, positioning. Ready-to-ship, not a slide deck.

Work with us