deepseek.com
30/100
Ranked #45,335 of 46,880 sites
deepseek.com
30/100 · #45,335 of 46,880
homepagerankings.com
Developer Tools / Infrastructure Benchmarks
How you compare to 6,886 Developer Tools / Infrastructure sites
Gray line = Developer Tools / Infrastructure median
Analysis
Deepseek scores 30 out of 100 on homepage messaging, earning a D- grade — mixed. Across all 30,134 sites analyzed, that's well below the median of 59. Within Developer Tools / Infrastructure, where the median is 60, Deepseek lands 30 points below the industry average.
No hero text found. Visitors see nothing above the fold that tells them what you do. With a clarity score of 17, Deepseek is below the overall median of 36.
Deepseek has no detectable call-to-action buttons on the homepage — a missed opportunity to direct visitor attention.
Audience targeting is unclear. Detected audience: B2B SaaS. ICP clarity score: 15 (below the median of 35).
On the pricing page: Enter your pricing page URL directly (try https://deepseek.com/pricing) for a full analysis.
The biggest opportunities for Deepseek: CTA effectiveness is below median — consider using action-oriented language ("Start free trial") over generic buttons ("Learn more"). Audience targeting is weak — adding a "for [specific role/company type]" pattern would sharpen the positioning immediately. Clarity is 19 points below median — the hero text needs to say what the product does in plain language.
Fix These First
up to +63 ptsRanked by estimated impact on your overall score
Add a clear hero headline
No hero headline detected — the most important real estate on your page is empty
Add a call-to-action button above the fold
No CTA detected — visitors have no clear next step
Sharpen your audience targeting
"For businesses" or "for teams" is too broad — name a role, industry, or company type
Add a CTA to your pricing page
Pricing page has no clear call-to-action — visitors can't convert
Add a free tier or annual billing option
Low-commitment entry points (free tier, annual discount) reduce purchase friction
First Impression
D (40/100)“A visitor would think this is a b2b saas for someone that offers api.”
B2B SaaS
Unknown
API
Visibility / Insights
Technical
Gaps:
- -No clear target audience defined. Could be for anyone, which means it resonates with no one.
- -Product description is vague. Visitors get a rough idea but no clear picture.
- -Value proposition is weakly communicated. Benefits are implied, not stated.
Suggested Rewrites
Better copy based on your product signals — click to copy
Current
深度求索（DeepSeek），成立于2023年，专注于研究世界领先的通用人工智能底层模型与技术，挑战人工智能前沿性难题。基于自研训练框架、自建智算集群和万卡算力等资源，深度求索团队仅用半年时间便已发布并开源多个百亿级参数大模型，如Deep…
This is what shows in Google results — specificity drives higher click-through rates
A/B Test Ideas
Specific experiments to run, ranked by expected impact
Test a "Built for [role/company type]" line under your hero
The "for X" pattern is the fastest way to sharpen positioning. Test it as a subheadline.
Test adding social proof above the fold (customer count, logos, or testimonial)
No social proof detected. Even one trust signal ("Join 500+ teams") can lift conversions significantly.
Test adding an annual/monthly billing toggle with a discount
Annual billing toggles with visible savings ("Save 20%") are a standard conversion lever.
Messaging Clarity
CTA Analysis
F (0/100)Total CTAs
0
Above Fold
0
What Do You Sell?
F (17/100)Hero
absentMeta Description
generic深度求索（DeepSeek），成立于2023年，专注于研究世界领先的通用人工智能底层模型与技术，挑战人工智能前沿性难题。基于自研训练框架、自建智算集群和万卡算力等资源，深度求索团队仅用半年时间便已发布并开源多个百亿级参数大模型，如DeepSeek-LLM通用大语言模型、DeepSeek-Coder代码大模型，并在2024年1月率先开源国内首个MoE大模型（DeepSeek-MoE），各大模型在公开评测榜单及真实样本外的泛化效果均有超越同级别模型的出色表现。和 DeepSeek AI 对话，轻松接入 API。
ICP Clarity
F (15/100)Detected audience
genericB2B SaaS
Pricing Page
F (15/100)How You Compare
vs. other Developer Tools / Infrastructure sites in the index
| Dimension | deepseek.com | chatwoot.com | tapfiliate.com | delve.co | helpscout.com |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 30 | 89-59 | 88-58 | 87-57 | 87-57 |
| Clarity | 17 | 62-45 | 100-83 | 72-55 | 100-83 |
| CTA | 0 | 73-73 | 70-70 | 78-78 | 70-70 |
| ICP | 15 | 45-30 | 95-80 | 95-80 | 50-35 |
| 1st Impr. | 40 | 52-12 | 94-54 | 66-26 | 44 |
| Pricing | 15 | 95-80 | 100-85 | 95-80 | 100-85 |
What We Analyzed
Title
DeepSeek | 深度求索
Word count
31
More in Developer Tools / Infrastructure
View Developer Tools / Infrastructure benchmarks →Track Your Progress
Last scanned 49 days ago. Time to check if your homepage has improved.
deepseek.com scored 30/100.
We fix exactly this. Messaging, CTAs, positioning. Ready-to-ship, not a slide deck.
Work with us