← All Tools

boingboing.net

D

39/100

Ranked #38,628 of 46,880 sites

Media / Content / PublishingSeed Stage
D

boingboing.net

39/100 · #38,628 of 46,880

homepagerankings.com

Media / Content / Publishing Benchmarks

How you compare to 6,908 Media / Content / Publishing sites

Overall
39-23 vs median
Product Clarity
47+4 vs median
CTA Effectiveness
57
ICP Targeting
18-20 vs median
First Impression
20-8 vs median

Gray line = Media / Content / Publishing median

Analysis

Boingboing scores 39 out of 100 on homepage messaging, earning a D grade — below average — significant gaps in clarity or targeting. Across all 30,134 sites analyzed, that's well below the median of 59. Within Media / Content / Publishing, where the median is 62, Boingboing lands 23 points below the industry average.

No hero text found. Visitors see nothing above the fold that tells them what you do. With a clarity score of 47, Boingboing is above the overall median of 36.

The page has 9 CTAs, 5 of them above the fold. The primary CTA "Contact Us" is generic — 'Learn more' and 'Get started' don't tell visitors what happens next.

Audience targeting is unclear. Detected audience: student. Role words found: "student". ICP clarity score: 18 (below the median of 35).

The biggest opportunities for Boingboing: Audience targeting is weak — adding a "for [specific role/company type]" pattern would sharpen the positioning immediately. First impression clarity is below median — visitors can't quickly tell what category this product falls into.

Fix These First

up to +47 pts

Ranked by estimated impact on your overall score

#1

Add a pricing page

Hiding pricing creates friction — most buyers want to self-qualify before talking to sales

+15 ptsPricing
#2

Add a clear hero headline

No hero headline detected — the most important real estate on your page is empty

+10 ptsClarity
#3

Sharpen your audience targeting

"For businesses" or "for teams" is too broad — name a role, industry, or company type

+10 ptsICP
#4

Close first-impression gaps

Visitors can't quickly tell who it's for and why it matters — those signals should be above the fold

+8 ptsFirst Impression
#5

Rewrite your meta description

Generic meta description — this is what shows up in Google results

+4 ptsClarity

First Impression

F (20/100)

A visitor would think this is a education / edtech for someone that offers something that launchs.

What kind of company?vague

Education / EdTech

Who is it for?missing

Unknown

What does it do?vague

Something that launchs

What's the benefit?missing

None detected

What's the vibe?vague

Casual

Gaps:

  • -Business category is implied but not clearly stated.
  • -No clear target audience defined. Could be for anyone, which means it resonates with no one.
  • -Product description is vague. Visitors get a rough idea but no clear picture.
  • -No discernible value proposition. The page does not explain why someone should care.

Suggested Rewrites

Better copy based on your product signals — click to copy

Primary CTA

Current

Contact Us

Tying your CTA to a specific outcome increases click-through

Meta Description

Current

Boing Boing is the Web's favorite site devoted to technology, entertainment, and culture. Launched in 1989 as a print '…

This is what shows in Google results — specificity drives higher click-through rates

A/B Test Ideas

Specific experiments to run, ranked by expected impact

Test adding "free" or "no card required" to your primary CTA

Risk-reducing modifiers typically lift click-through 10-15%

medium

Test a "free" modifier on your CTA: "Contact Us" vs "Contact Us — Free"

"Free" is the highest-converting modifier across 27K+ homepages analyzed

medium

Test a "Built for [role/company type]" line under your hero

The "for X" pattern is the fastest way to sharpen positioning. Test it as a subheadline.

medium

Messaging Clarity

Who is this for?15/100
What problem does this solve?15/100
What does this actually do?15/100
Why this over alternatives?15/100
CTA effectiveness57/100

CTA Analysis

C+ (57/100)

Total CTAs

9

Above Fold

5

Best CTA

Tier 3

Contact Us
above foldT3 · 57/100
SUBSCRIBE
above foldT3 · 45/100
Subscribe now!
T3 · 43/100
15 pages a day turns you into a reader of 40+ books a year
above foldT5 · 14/100
(Contact Support)
above foldT5 · 10/100
books
above foldT5 · 10/100

What Do You Sell?

C- (47/100)

In 5 words:

App to store menu

Hero

absent

Meta Description

generic

Boing Boing is the Web's favorite site devoted to technology, entertainment, and culture. Launched in 1989 as a print 'zine and still...

5 function signalsDetected: app

ICP Clarity

F (18/100)

Detected audience

generic

student

student
rolestudent

Pricing Page

F (0/100)

No pricing page detected.

How You Compare

vs. other Media / Content / Publishing sites in the index

Dimensionboingboing.netkeap.comzight.cominfusionsoft.…managewp.com
Overall3987-4887-4887-4886-47
Clarity4759-12100-5359-12100-53
CTA5775-186075-1875-18
ICP1846-2891-7346-2815
1st Impr.2060-4060-4060-4052-32
Pricing095-9580-8095-95100-100

What We Analyzed

Title

Boing Boing - A Directory of Mostly Wonderful Things

Word count

667

Track Your Progress

Last scanned 49 days ago. Time to check if your homepage has improved.

boingboing.net scored 39/100.

We fix exactly this. Messaging, CTAs, positioning. Ready-to-ship, not a slide deck.

Work with us