awn.com
58/100
Ranked #24,918 of 46,880 sites
awn.com
58/100 · #24,918 of 46,880
homepagerankings.com
Media / Content / Publishing Benchmarks
How you compare to 6,908 Media / Content / Publishing sites
Gray line = Media / Content / Publishing median
Analysis
Awn scores 58 out of 100 on homepage messaging, earning a C grade — average — basic messaging is present but generic. Across all 30,134 sites analyzed, that's close to the median of 59.
The hero text reads: "Top Stories". Lacks action verbs. The hero does not describe what the product actually does, just makes a vague claim. The language is generic — a visitor can't tell what the product does from the headline alone. With a clarity score of 53, Awn is above the overall median of 36.
The page has 15 CTAs, 4 of them above the fold. That's enough to trigger decision paralysis — when too many buttons compete for attention, visitors often click none. The primary CTA "Exclusive: Iron Circus Launches Jay Eaton’s 'Runa…" is a value-oriented CTA — it promises a benefit, not just an action.
Audience targeting is unclear. Detected audience: Audience not defined on the page. ICP clarity score: 0 (below the median of 35).
Awn fits the "Community / Movement" archetype with moderate confidence. This means the homepage is rallying users around a mission or identity, not just a product.
The biggest opportunities for Awn: Audience targeting is weak — adding a "for [specific role/company type]" pattern would sharpen the positioning immediately. First impression clarity is below median — visitors can't quickly tell what category this product falls into.
Fix These First
up to +59 ptsRanked by estimated impact on your overall score
Add a "for [specific audience]" pattern to your hero
Visitors can't tell if this product is for them — specificity wins trust
Add a pricing page
Hiding pricing creates friction — most buyers want to self-qualify before talking to sales
Reduce CTAs above the fold to one primary action
4 competing buttons cause decision paralysis — visitors click none
Rewrite your hero headline
Generic language — visitors can't tell what you do from the headline alone
Close first-impression gaps
Visitors can't quickly tell who it's for and what it does — those signals should be above the fold
First Impression
F (20/100)“A visitor would think this is a media / content / publishing for someone that offers something unclear.”
Media / Content / Publishing
Unknown
Unknown
Status / Identity / Belonging
Neutral
Gaps:
- -Business category is implied but not clearly stated.
- -No clear target audience defined. Could be for anyone, which means it resonates with no one.
- -Product function unclear from above-fold copy. Visitors cannot tell what this does.
- -Value proposition is weakly communicated. Benefits are implied, not stated.
Suggested Rewrites
Better copy based on your product signals — click to copy
Current
Top Stories
Your current headline is generic — these alternatives name what you do for whom
A/B Test Ideas
Specific experiments to run, ranked by expected impact
Remove all secondary CTAs above the fold — keep only one primary action
4 competing CTAs detected. Single-CTA pages typically convert 20-30% better.
Test a hero headline that names your product category explicitly
Generic headlines force visitors to scroll to understand what you sell. Test naming the category in the first 5 words.
Test adding "for Audience not defined on the page" to your hero or subheadline
Naming your audience explicitly increases relevance. Visitors self-qualify faster when they see themselves.
Test adding social proof above the fold (customer count, logos, or testimonial)
No social proof detected. Even one trust signal ("Join 500+ teams") can lift conversions significantly.
Test adding a one-line product description directly under your hero
Visitors can't tell what you do from the above-fold content. A single explanatory line can fix this.
Messaging Clarity
CTA Analysis
C+ (60/100)Total CTAs
15
Above Fold
4
Best CTA
Tier 2
What Do You Sell?
C (53/100)In 5 words:
Network to search form
Hero
genericTop Stories
Meta Description
genericCelebrating the Art, Craft and Business of Animation
ICP Clarity
F (0/100)Detected audience
absentAudience not defined on the page
Positioning Archetype
70% confidenceCommunity / Movement
Top Stories
Confidence: 70%
Pricing Page
F (0/100)No pricing page detected.
How You Compare
vs. other Media / Content / Publishing sites in the index
| Dimension | awn.com | keap.com | zight.com | infusionsoft.… | managewp.com |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 58 | 87-29 | 87-29 | 87-29 | 86-28 |
| Clarity | 53 | 59-6 | 100-47 | 59-6 | 100-47 |
| CTA | 60 | 75-15 | 60 | 75-15 | 75-15 |
| ICP | 0 | 46-46 | 91-91 | 46-46 | 15-15 |
| 1st Impr. | 20 | 60-40 | 60-40 | 60-40 | 52-32 |
| Pricing | 0 | 95-95 | 80-80 | 95-95 | 100-100 |
What We Analyzed
Title
Animation World Network | Celebrating the Art, Craft and Business of Animation
Word count
5,427
Hero text
Top Stories
More in Media / Content / Publishing
View Media / Content / Publishing benchmarks →Track Your Progress
Last scanned 49 days ago. Time to check if your homepage has improved.
awn.com scored 58/100.
We fix exactly this. Messaging, CTAs, positioning. Ready-to-ship, not a slide deck.
Work with us