← All rankings

Homepage report

voting.works

Ranked #7,409 of 30,521 homepages.

Vague headline and no proof near the top. A visitor has to guess what it does.

68/100

B
The voting.works homepage, first screen

First screen at 1280px wide.

What we noticed

  1. 1

    The headline doesn’t say what Voting does.

    “We make election technology every American can trust.” could sit on a lot of homepages. A first-time visitor still has to guess what you sell.

    Try: Say what it is and who it’s for, in plain words, in the headline itself.

  2. 2

    Nothing near the top says anyone else uses it.

    No customer logos, numbers or quotes show up near the headline.

    Try: Add a short proof line under the buttons: a customer count, a few logos or one real quote.

  3. 3

    “Contact Us” works, but it’s generic.

    Almost every site has this button. It doesn’t say what the visitor gets.

    Try: Add what they get or what it costs, like a free trial or a live demo.

Analysis

Voting.works scores 68 out of 100, a B. The core message lands, but a few parts make visitors work harder than they should. That puts it in the top quarter of the 30,521 homepages we've ranked, where the median is 60.

The headline reads "We make election technology every American can trust.". The headline makes a broad claim without saying what the product actually does.

The page has 2 CTAs, 1 of them above the fold. That's a focused set that won't overwhelm visitors. The main button, "Contact Us", is generic and doesn't tell visitors what happens next. Its CTA score is 62, above the median of 45.

There are signals about who this is for, but the audience could be sharper. Detected audience: anyone to verify. It uses a "for [audience]" line: "anyone to verify".

Voting.works fits the "Trust / Authority" archetype with high confidence.

Here's where Voting.works has the most to gain. First-impression clarity is below the median, so visitors can't quickly tell what category the product is in.

Fix These First

up to +40 pts

Ranked by estimated impact on your overall score

#1

Add a pricing page

Hidden pricing adds friction, since most buyers want to qualify themselves before talking to sales

+15 ptsPricing
#2

Rewrite your hero headline

The wording is generic, so visitors can't tell what you do from the headline alone

+8 ptsClarity
#3

Close first-impression gaps

Visitors can't quickly tell who it's for and why it matters. That should be clear above the fold

+8 ptsFirst Impression
#4

Shift copy from "we" to "you"

Your above-fold copy says "we" 10x but "you" only 3x. Visitors care about their problems, not yours

+5 ptsClarity
#5

Rewrite your meta description

The meta description is generic, and it's what people see in Google results

+4 ptsClarity

First Impression

F (20/100)

“A visitor would think this is a b2b saas for someone that offers system.”

What kind of company?B2B SaaSvague
Who is it for?Unknownmissing
What does it do?systemvague
What's the benefit?None detectedmissing
What's the vibe?Professionalvague

Gaps:

  • -Business category is implied but not clearly stated.
  • -No clear target audience defined. Could be for anyone, which means it resonates with no one.
  • -Product description is vague. Visitors get a rough idea but no clear picture.
  • -No discernible value proposition. The page does not explain why someone should care.

Want a human to tear down voting.works?

Each week Alex Stonehouse of Brilliantly Wrong records five free video teardowns for sites that ask. Each one covers what a first-time buyer takes away and the three fixes that matter most.

Suggested Rewrites

Rewrites based on what your page says. Click one to copy it.

Hero Headline

Current

We make election technology every American can trust.

Your headline is generic. These alternatives say what you do and for whom

Primary CTA

Current

Contact Us

Tying your CTA to a specific outcome increases click-through

Meta Description

Current

This is the homepage of the website

This is what shows in Google results, and specific descriptions get more clicks

A/B Test Ideas

Specific experiments to run, ranked by expected impact

Test adding "free" or "no card required" to your primary CTA

Risk-reducing modifiers typically lift click-through 10-15%

medium

Test a "free" modifier on your CTA: "Contact Us" vs "Contact Us: Free"

"Free" is the strongest CTA modifier in the homepages we score

medium

Test a hero headline that names your product category explicitly

Generic headlines force visitors to scroll to understand what you sell. Test naming the category in the first 5 words.

high

Rewrite above-fold copy from "we" language to "you" language

Your copy says "we" 10x and "you" 3x. Visitor-centric copy typically converts better.

medium

Messaging Clarity

Who is this for?58/100
What problem does this solve?66/100
What does this actually do?66/100
Why this over alternatives?66/100
CTA effectiveness57/100

CTA Analysis

C+ (62/100)

Total CTAs

2

Above Fold

1

Best CTA

Tier 3

“Contact Us”
above foldTier 3, 57/100
“Skip to Content”
Tier 3, 45/100

What Do You Sell?

D+ (43/100)

In 5 words:

Software to verify were

Hero

generic

We make election technology every American can trust.

Meta Description

generic

This is the homepage of the website

1 buzzword2 function signalsDetected: software

ICP Clarity

D (40/100)

Detected audience

decent

anyone to verify

Positioning Archetype

95% confidence

Trust / Authority

We make election technology every American can trust.

Confidence: 95%

Pricing Page

F (0/100)

No pricing page detected.

What We Analyzed

Title

Home | VotingWorks

Word count

184

Hero text

We make election technology every American can trust.

Track Your Progress

Scanned October 2026. If voting.works has changed since, re-scan to see the new score.

voting.works scored 68/100.

We fix exactly this. Messaging, CTAs, positioning. Ready-to-ship, not a slide deck.

Work with us